[How To]: Install VLC 2.0 “Twoflower” On Fedora 16

VLC is a free and open-source multimedia player. it works on major operating systems. A few days ago we have seen VLC 2.0 changes highlights in this post and installation instructions for Ubuntu users. Now, VLC 2.0 is available to install on Fedora 16 Verne using Remi repository.

Check VLC 2.0 Twoflower release notes.

First you will need to add Remi repository for Fedora 16 Verne.

su

rpm -Uvh http://rpms.famillecollet.com/remi-release-16.rpm

yum --enablerepo=remi-test

yum install vlc

VLC official web page.

16 thoughts on “[How To]: Install VLC 2.0 “Twoflower” On Fedora 16

  1. Hi!. I use Fedora 16 64bit and I have followed your steps I get the 1.13 version, ¿Is it working for 64b?

    thanks!
    salu2…
    masch…

    • Yes, this works for 64 and 32 bit system. Check the “Software Sources”, you will find it beneath “system” drop down menu in the “add/remove software”. Make sure you have checked the box for remi repository to be able to use it.
      or, you enable the repository using this command
      yum –enablerepo=remi-test
      “post has been updated with enable instruction for Remi repository.”

      Please tell me how it goes with you!
      mhnassif.

  2. Hmm, for me it says
    “Error getting repository data for remi-test, repository not found”.

    Maybe because im on Fedora15?

  3. Confirmed as ineffective for i686/i386,

    http://rpms.famillecollet.com/fedora/16/test/x86_64/repoview/vlc.html

    The entire “multimedia” section is missing from the i386 repos.

    The comment by the author of the article is a little asinine; of *course* a compiled native 64-bit binary will not work for a 32-bit system, and the provided x86_64 packages are not i386. Please don’t simply install a 64-bit RPM in the hopes of getting this working.

    I run PAE on my home machine since it’s been updated since FC4, unfortunately, and this method doesn’t work. I’ll be sure to update if I track down a F16 repo enabling VLC2. At least when I compiled this from source, the ffmpeg requirements were exceeding that of Rawhide’s standard repos; perhaps the dependency resolution wasn’t worth managing (or is not yet) for the i686 tree.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>